skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Martins, Aline_C"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT AimInsect brood parasites (i.e., cleptoparasites), like cuckoo bees, typically attack hosts within specific lineages, but seem to be less constrained by the biogeographical movements of their hosts compared to obligate parasites. Cuckoo bees depend on stable host populations, being particularly sensitive to environmental changes and thus valuable bioindicators of the bee community health. We here test the congruence between the biogeographical history of cuckoo oil bees and their oil bee hosts. LocationThe Americas. TaxonBees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). MethodsUsing phylogenomic and Sanger sequence data, we present new time‐calibrated phylogenies for cuckoo oil bees in the ericrocidine line and their oil bee hosts,CentrisandEpicharis.We estimate their ancestral ranges using six historical biogeographical models on a set of 100 trees, randomly sampled from the posterior distribution of phylogenies in each group, thus accounting for uncertainties in divergence time estimates and model selection. ResultsThe origin of the hosts stem in the Cretaceous precedes the origin of their cleptoparasite's stem in the Palaeocene. Cleptoparasite and host crown origins were synchronous in the Eocene, and both took place in tropical South America. While the pair Rhathymini‐Epicharisremained mostly associated within this region,Centrisand their cleptoparasites expanded their distribution to other parts of Neotropical and Nearctic regions in independent range expansions events. In all cases, host range shifts preceded the cleptoparasite shifts. Main ConclusionThe biogeographical history of cleptoparasitic oil bees and oil‐collecting hosts is generally congruent in time and space. Events of range expansion mainly occurred in the more species‐rich lineages of cleptoparasites. Range shifts in cleptoparasites followed the distribution of their hosts and coincided with the distribution of oil‐producing plants visited by the host bees. Our results broaden our understanding of the complex biogeography of interacting partners and on how changes in host distributions may impact cleptoparasitic bees. 
    more » « less